| **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Nov 20 09:51:39 2004 | ||
| -->You are now talking on #schooltool | 09:51 | |
| ---Topic for #schooltool is http://schooltool.org | 09:51 | |
| ---Topic for #schooltool set by Aiste at Mon Oct 18 12:47:26 2004 | 09:51 | |
| **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Nov 20 10:30:44 2004 | ||
| **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Nov 20 10:34:14 2004 | ||
| -->You are now talking on #schooltool | 10:34 | |
| ---Topic for #schooltool is http://schooltool.org | 10:34 | |
| ---Topic for #schooltool set by Aiste at Mon Oct 18 12:47:26 2004 | 10:34 | |
| -->bskahan (~bskahan@dsl093-119-225.blt1.dsl.speakeasy.net) has joined #schooltool | 16:33 | |
| bskahan | mgedmin: is there any reason a relationshipschema has to be defined as rel_type, role_a, role_b | 16:38 |
|---|---|---|
| bskahan | (in the code that's the only way it can happen) | 16:38 |
| mgedmin | what do you mean? | 16:38 |
| bskahan | rel_type, **roles would let us use rdfs style definitions | 16:39 |
| mgedmin | ah, I see | 16:39 |
| mgedmin | currently all relationships in schooltool are binary | 16:39 |
| bskahan | yeah | 16:39 |
| mgedmin | the reason is that we never needed more complex relationships | 16:39 |
| bskahan | is there a reason to keep it that way? | 16:39 |
| bskahan | ok | 16:39 |
| mgedmin | I don't think so | 16:39 |
| mgedmin | it's just that there was no point in making the code more complicated when there were no use cases | 16:40 |
| *bskahan nods | 16:40 | |
| bskahan | cool, I just wasn't sure if it broke something conceptually at a level I wasn't aware of | 16:40 |
| bskahan | thanks | 16:40 |
| ---pere_poff is now known as pere | 17:23 | |
| **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Nov 20 20:57:23 2004 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!